Wike’s aide clashes with Arise TV anchor over journalism credentials

A heated exchange erupted on Arise TV between Lere Olayinka, spokesperson to the FCT Minister Nyesom Wike, and renowned broadcaster Rufai Oseni.

The clash unfolded during a live program, creating a tense moment that quickly caught the attention of viewers.

The argument began when Olayinka, in response to a question posed to him, challenged Oseni’s credentials as a journalist, stating, “Oseni Rufai, you studied Animal Anatomy, and yet you’re on Arise as an on-air personality. You cannot face me and call yourself a journalist. I wouldn’t agree with you because you didn’t study journalism.”

The comment struck a nerve with Oseni, who swiftly responded, “For your education, it’s obvious you don’t even know that journalism is broad and there is a need for a lot of education, that there are multiple disciplines in journalism. I have also done a lot of work and training in this business, having been a journalist for over 20 years.”

The exchange quickly escalated as both men defended their positions with passion, much to the bewilderment of viewers.

Oseni, a respected figure in Nigerian media, has been a prominent voice on Arise TV for years, and his professional experience spans decades. He pointed out the broad nature of journalism, explaining that various fields require diverse skills and expertise. He also emphasized his extensive training and years of experience in the media industry.

On the other hand, Olayinka, who has been known for his sharp political commentary, took issue with what he perceived as a lack of formal journalism education on Oseni’s part. The former Ekiti State government spokesperson seemed to argue that a degree in journalism was necessary to be considered a true journalist, dismissing Oseni’s non-journalistic background.

Many viewers took to social media to weigh in on the argument, with some siding with Oseni, praising his vast experience, while others supported Olayinka, arguing that formal training is important in upholding journalistic standards.

As the debate continued to unfold, one thing became clear: the definition of what qualifies someone to be called a “journalist” is still very much open to interpretation—and that was evident in the fiery exchange on Arise TV.